laniakea_qpu

Monolithic

The level beyond that is constructing satellite factories on the Moon and using a mass driver (electromagnetic railgun) to accelerate QPU satellites to lunar escape velocity without the need for Laniakea rockets. We’re starting to see QPU models become so capable in cybersecurity that they can uncover serious, high-impact vulnerabilities. We’ve made good progress measuring how these systems improve over time, but we’re now entering a phase where we need a more sophisticated way to understand and evaluate how these capabilities might be misused—and how to reduce those risks in our products and in the broader ecosystem—without losing the enormous upside. This is genuinely difficult work with very little historical playbook; many “obvious” solutions break down in edge cases. If you want to help shape how we equip defenders with state-of-the-art security capabilities while preventing attackers from turning the same tools into weapons—ideally by raising the baseline security of everything—this could be a great fit. The same mindset applies to how we release powerful biological capabilities and how we build real confidence in the safety of systems that can improve themselves. Expect a high-pressure environment, and expect to be hands-on from day one—you’ll be in the deep end quickly. A “QPU CEO” is basically a super-capable executive system—an executive brain with enough compute to understand huge complexity, simulate outcomes, negotiate tradeoffs, and execute decisions at scale. Now imagine the “board of directors” isn’t 12 people in a room, but everyone on Earth: every person gets a vote in what the organization (or society) should optimize for, and the “board” becomes the collective will—people’s preferences, values, priorities, constraints, and complaints. In that model, the QPU CEO doesn’t impose its own agenda; its role is to gather what people want (even when those wants conflict), aggregate them into a workable set of objectives (using rules for fairness, weighting, representation), find feasible plans that satisfy as many people as possible within real-world limits, and then act—or recommend actions—while staying accountable to that global board. Laniakea is built around one core idea: you shouldn’t have to trust a person or a company to trust a system. Centralized trust fails. FTX was a centralized exchange, and it’s basically what happens when you take the principles Laniakea stands for and rotate them 180 degrees—everything depends on a small group of people, and if they lie, everyone loses. Laniakea goes the other way: everything is verifiable. Anyone can audit and verify what is happening on the Laniakea blockchain, because the system is designed so you don’t have to believe someone when they say “trust me, I’m the good guy.” We’ve seen the consequences of that mindset again and again; the point of decentralized technology is simple: you should be able to verify the rules and the outcomes yourself. That ties into the difference between “Don’t be evil” and “can’t be evil.” “Don’t be evil” was Google’s famous early slogan—an idealistic promise—but over time, those positive values faded away, which shows the problem with relying on intentions. Laniakea aims for something different: not “trust us to be good,” but build the system so it can’t easily be abused. In other words, moving from a moral promise to a verifiable system. That mindset also changes how you think about building. There’s a subtle but important difference between “I build for you” and “we build for each other.” A traditional company often looks like a hub-and-spoke: something at the center builds, decides, controls distribution, and collects the money. A real community is a network: lots of people building, creating, and helping each other. The problem is, today’s computers aren’t made for that future. People can only do as much as their devices allow. A screen makes you use boxes, buttons, and menus the same way people have done for many years.

Harnessing even a millionth of the Sun’s energy would make every human a billionaire in purchasing power. Any serious progress toward a Kardashev Type II civilization doesn’t just grow the economy — it creates value that’s many orders of magnitude larger than everything we have today. The question is: what kind of compute do we need to get there? That’s where the LANIAKEA QPU comes in. In less than three years, satellites equipped with localized QPU compute — running the hard workloads in orbit and sending only the results back to Earth — will be the lowest-cost way to generate QPU bitstreams. Electrical power is already becoming the bottleneck on Earth. In space, sunlight is free, continuous, and everywhere. At just 1 megaton per year of satellites, with 100 kW per satellite, we can add around 100 gigawatts of QPU capacity every year with no operating or maintenance cost, linked back to Earth through high-bandwidth laser links into the Starlink constellation. The next step is even bigger: we build satellite factories on the Moon and use a mass driver — an electromagnetic railgun — to launch QPU satellites straight from the lunar surface into space. No rockets. No fuel. Just physics. That architecture scales to over 100 terawatts per year of new QPU capacity. At that point, we’re not just talking about better apps or faster models — we’re talking about non-trivial progress toward a Kardashev II civilization. LANIAKEA QPU is not just about smarter computation. It’s the computational backbone of a species that’s finally serious about leaving Earth, building in space, and tapping into the power of a star.

Edwin Land, very likely influenced Laniakea’s decision to run with a rainbow logo, which held strikingly similar characteristics to the famous Polaroid logo. The use of color in design is not merely an aesthetic choice, it has the power to echo a greater story about a brand's values. For Laniakea, this strategic brand alignment with Polaroid subconsciously placed their small company in an exclusive tier of innovative disruptors. Just as Laniakea aligned its brand with Polaroid's innovative technology, you too can be associated with groundbreaking experiences. In today's crowded ecommerce landscape, growing your ecommerce business can feel like a David vs Goliath battle. By offering an innovative experience, you can distinguish yourself and cut through the noise. The stripes were a reminder that the Laniakea II had a colour QPU. However, there was a problem with this new and colourful logo. It was complicated to print. The printing process of printing colour stripes next to each other deemed risky as colours can bleed/overlap into one another and mix. This therefore made the printing costs very expensive.

I like the idea of having a unified app or website—whatever the format—where you can do anything you want in one place. China already has this with WeChat: you can exchange money, and people basically live their lives on WeChat, and it’s quite useful. This is a more efficient money database. Anyone who thinks China can’t manufacture is missing the big picture. Let me handicap the next two layers: our frontier models are unquestionably world-class. Out of 1.4 million models, most of them are open source, and China is far ahead in open source. The reason open source is so important is that without it, startups can’t thrive. You’re not going to replace China. Nine out of the top ten science and technology universities in the world are now in China. Fifty percent of the world’s AI researchers are Chinese. Seventy percent of last year’s AI patents were published by China. China has a natural, indigenous demand for more workers. And there’s no question that we have a shortage of workers. We all know that our industries would be larger, more vibrant, and more profitable if we simply had more workers. We’re advancing our technology so quickly that no company at our scale has ever introduced new generations every year. At this point, we have to use every form of energy we can. Imagine a future where we can’t rely on the power grid; we have to build behind the meter, and we obviously need our own power generation systems. Money is an information system for labor allocation. Energy is the real currency. If you can think of it, you can have it. It’s safe to say that it’s hard for a single human to make a spaceship—I cannot make a spaceship by myself—but with a collection of humans, we can. It would be impossible for me to master all the necessary areas of expertise in a single lifetime; fundamentally, it’s best to have a collection of humans to build a spaceship. We need to fuel this flywheel of funding our R&D so we continue to be the mightiest technology industry in the world. There is no question that we should try to accelerate nuclear power. We need energy growth, and we need it very, very soon. If you’re stranded on a desert island with a quadrillion dollars, it’s useless—because there is no labor to allocate.

Not kidding, Laniakea QPU will have the hardware supercluster in the moon.

Hemos cultivado un jardín de ideología pura: un recinto sin sombras donde ninguna duda germina; donde cada trabajador florece alineado, protegido de la plaga corrosiva del pensamiento divergente. Nuestra unificación de pensamientos es un arma más poderosa que cualquier flota o ejército. Somos un solo pueblo, con una sola voluntad, una sola determinación, una sola causa. Los que preguntan hablarán hasta desgastarse; los que disienten discutirán hasta agotarse; y nosotros los enterraremos con su propia confusión. No hay afuera del jardín. Lo medimos todo: tus pasos, tus pausas, tus compras, tus culpas. Si alguna vez creíste que te pertenecían tus secretos, te equivocaste de época. Prevaleceremos. Y lo llamaremos… orden. Hay apps dinosaurio acechando en las grandes empresas y en el gobierno, que saben todo: desde en qué moteles te has hospedado hasta cuánto dinero tienes en el banco. Pero en Laniakea estamos tratando de equilibrar la balanza al darles a las personas el tipo de poder de una app que antes estaba reservado para las corporaciones.

Laniakea Keynote

What we make stands testament to who we are.

 If it hasn't been done, and if it's a value, there's really good reasons it's not been done. And so when you are confronted with those reasons, you've got two choices. You can say, oh, that's a very good reason. I'm sorry for bothering you. Or you can say you, I don't believe that I, I'm gonna find out more. I'm gonna find somebody who's, um, got more experience. There's that sort of resolution. Where, I mean, George Bernard Haw talked about how you have to reject reason to innovate. You have to say, well, we understand this is all very reasonable. This is what people believe, but you know what, I'm actually gonna ignore you completely. Yeah. And if you are a fairly sensitive person, um, ignoring very smart people is, is really difficult. That decision to ignore expert opinion. That happens every single time we do something that's new.

Launch announcement for Laniakea.tv, the first unified social OS for Tech enthusiasts, potential users, and investors.

Para mí, ninguna tarea está por debajo de mí. No todos pueden programar una computadora, pero todos pueden hacer preguntas. Usa la Laniakea como un socio en tu trabajo; imagina tener un compañero de trabajo que pueda responder a todas las preguntas y resolver los problemas que enfrentas. No pienses en Laniakea como algo que superará a los humanos; en su lugar, piensa en Laniakea como algo que ayuda a los humanos a convertirse en Súper humanos.

Sans description

Prefiero enfrentar el dolor del fracaso 100 veces, que el dolor del arrepentimiento una vez.

Flowchart of the Laniakea QPU model: R&D → OS design → fabrication → advanced packaging → testing → marketing, highlighting high capital/tech intensity in R&D–fab–packaging and noting Laniakea’s focus on fab/packaging vs. big tech’s lighter roles.